Document Type : applied research
Author
Member of the faculty of Ilam University
Abstract
For centuries, researchers in the field of rhetoric and imagery have been referring to the art of phrasing as a melodious and dynamic art to highlight the original images hidden in literary texts. Basically, the problem is that this industry by itself cannot be considered a consistent and value-creating element in the direction of portraying pure poetic concepts. What is certain is that the mere application of the innovative opinion of the poet in the process of processing the audio effects in the text, as long as it is not based on the aspect of equating the visual meanings with the audio effects arising from it, cannot be considered as a valid literary advantage. In order to provide mental imagery to the searching audience. It should be known that the mere accumulation of a large amount of similar letters with the same rhythmic effects may in many cases not only not give a rhetorical boost to the text, but also causes the appearance of lines of phonetic conflict in the visual systems of the text. This research, based on the descriptive-analytical method and based on sound scientific data in textual and phonetic sources, leads us to the conclusion that grammar as an intermediary industry cannot necessarily have audio-conceptual efficiency, but even It can disrupt the final meaning and rhetoric of the image, as sometimes it is used only to induce a fleeting sense of pleasure, which lacks any cognitive aspects, and sometimes it even deviates from the audio standards accepted
Keywords
Main Subjects