Rhetoric
Azar Salarvand
Abstract
abstractRhetoric is the main subject of literature and it is used in the meaning of linguistic mastery, eloquence, eloquence, eloquence, maturity and growth, and in the term, it is eloquent speech that is in accordance with the requirements of the situation and position.The authors of prominent interpretative ...
Read More
abstractRhetoric is the main subject of literature and it is used in the meaning of linguistic mastery, eloquence, eloquence, eloquence, maturity and growth, and in the term, it is eloquent speech that is in accordance with the requirements of the situation and position.The authors of prominent interpretative and mystical texts are generally familiar with literary sciences and especially the knowledge of rhetoric, and sometimes they have subtle references to some of the hidden secrets of this knowledge in the beginning of their works, among which we can mention Abul Fattouh Razi, Abul Fazl Mibdi, Ain al-Qadat Hamdani. , Mostamli Bukhari and... pointed out. But since a group of these rhetorical points have remained far from the eyes of rhetorical leaders and have received less attention; It is necessary to discover, plan and analyze them from among their writings. The present study tries to study and investigate some important interpretive and mystical texts, with analytical-descriptive method, to present and analyze those rare rhetorical arts that have been neglected from the point of view of rhetoric scholars. After analyzing the samples, the authors conclude that in mystical texts and ancient Quranic interpretations, there are rarely used and rarely found techniques such as: lexical analysis, the theory of the wrongdoing, multiple meanings of words, politeness of questions, etc. .Keywords: rhetoric, interpretive texts, mystical texts, rhetorical omissions.
Rhetoric
Ahmad Aryan; ahmad goli; Rahman Moshtaghmehr
Abstract
SummaryStrangeness in a word means that it is not clear and unfamiliar in use, which most rhetoric scholars have considered to be a defect in eloquence. The oldest book that had mentioned the oddity in Islamic rhetoric and proposed the non-use of it as a condition of eloquence is Khatib Qazvini's "Al ...
Read More
SummaryStrangeness in a word means that it is not clear and unfamiliar in use, which most rhetoric scholars have considered to be a defect in eloquence. The oldest book that had mentioned the oddity in Islamic rhetoric and proposed the non-use of it as a condition of eloquence is Khatib Qazvini's "Al Izah" and since then, through the history of the teaching of rhetoric, the principle has been followed up to now. But contemporary rhetoricians consider this model of eloquence, and many other principles of traditional rhetoric, to be ineffective in the face of contemporary literary criticism and the analysis as well as aesthetics of literary texts. They have presented their theories in this regard in several articles and insisted to revise them. This article, considering the criticism of traditional rhetoric and the necessity of its revision, has studied one of the defects of eloquence in an analytical-critical way, With the presupposition that traditional eloquence with its negative patterns, willy-nilly neglected poetic language, it has shown its efficiency more in the field of grammar than rhetoric. Poetry or prose in its simultaneity axis, the nature of language and from the point of view of stylistics, it is a kind of defamiliarization and avoidance of norms that has caused the stylistic differentiation of the writer or poet, it can play an important role in shaping the literariness of speech.
